Saturday, 19 of May of 2012

Tag » workers

Fatal BNSF Crash Could Have Been Prevented by PTC, NTSB Says

The agency also noted that improving scheduling to reduce crew members' fatigue was essential for stopping accidents before they happen.

By Rick Shapiro, Railroad Employee Wrongful Death Attorney

A yearlong investigation into a fatal rear-end collision on tracks near Red Oak, Iowa (IA), that left two Burlington Northern Santa Fe train crew members dead led the National Transportation Safety Board to conclude that proper scheduling and technology could have prevented the crash or significantly lessened its severity.


View a larger map of where a fatal BNSF train collision occurred near Red Oak,IA.

NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman announced the findings on April 24, 2012. Her agency’s main conclusion was that the collision between the BNSF train and a stopped track maintenance vehicle occurred because the engineer and conductor crewing the moving train had fallen asleep. The two men began their shift at 2:13 am, and the accident happened around 6:00 am. Both had been working on-call schedules and had gone several days without getting adequate sleep.

Hersman went on to note that the rail employees’ fatigue would most likely have not led directly to a fatal crash if their locomotive and rail cars were equipped with positive train control systems. PTC could have automatically slowed the train, reducing the force of the impact, or stopped it altogether.

The NTSB chair also said that that the BNSF accident highlighted the need for rail equipment manufacturers to improve the crashworthiness of modular crew cabs. She promised her agency would be working on those.

In a press release, Hersman said, “Human nature – and our need for sleep – must be respected; it must be addressed. …  Humans are fallible and make mistakes and operational accidents can be prevented with positive train control.”

As a railroad worker injury and wrongful death attorney based in Virginia (VA), I know that PTC has supposed to be coming for all major railroads for some time. I also know that rail corporations — including Amtrak, BNSF, CSX and Norfolk Southern — have been pushing regulators to move back deadlines for PTC implementation. The billion-dollar corporations say installing the safety systems will cost too much. To me, this means the railroads place less value on the health and lives of their employees than required, or even approaching fair in light of the record profits companies like BNSf, CSX and NS have been making for years.

Failing the quick adoption of PTC, I hope BNSF and all other rail operators will at least look at staffing levels and scheduling practices, then make the appropriate adjustments to limit worker fatigue.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


BNSF Forced to Back Off Demand for Rail Workers’ Private Medical Records

Employers cannot compel employees to disclose any information about illnesses, injuries, health conditions, doctor visits or ongoing therapies when those situations are not related to workers' job performance.

By Rick Shapiro, Railroad Injury Attorney

Federal laws ranging from the Americans With Disabilities Act to the Pregnancy Discrimination Act make it illegal for any business in any industry to use may kinds of information in workers’ private medical files to make hiring, promotion and firing decisions. As corollaries to those rules, employers cannot compel employees to disclose any information about illnesses, injuries, health conditions, doctor visits or ongoing therapies when those situations are not related to workers’ job performance.

Freight railroad giant BNSF Railway intentionally violated all its employees’ federal medical privacy protections when, starting January 1, 2012, the railroad required engineers, conductors, trackmen, rail yard workers and office personnel to share every piece of health information with immediate supervisors. In a discrimination complaint filed with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen noted that BNSF’s policy on medical disclosure extended to ”medical conditions and/or events that occur or are diagnosed while they are away from work … even if there is no reasonable basis for believing the condition or event has any impact on the employee’s ability to perform his/her job, and even when the employee’s own doctor has placed no limitations on the employee’s job activities.”

The United Transportation Union, along with eight other groups representing rail workers across the United States, also petitioned the EEOC to compel BNSF to rescind the medical reporting policy. The organizations argued that requiring employees to “share doctor’s notes, diagnostic test results and hospital discharge summaries” could serve no other purpose than providing the rail corporation non-job-related health information it could use to make employment decisions.

BNSF announced that it was rescinding the policy — officially listed a Rule 26.3.1 in its employee handbook – in early April. A company spokeswoman told the Lincoln (NE) Journal Star that BNSF wanted only to protect other workers and the public from employees whose health problems might make them unsafe. In that same article, though, a different railroad representative was quoted as confirming to Progressive Railroading that BNSF wanted the private medical records for “expeditious, confidential handling of fitness-for-duty reviews.”

Again: Numerous federal laws explicitly prohibit the use of large categories of medical information for making employment decisions. BNSF was definitely violating workers’ privacy when issuing and enforcing Rule 26.3.1. It attempted to justify the illegal and discriminatory policy by claiming employees had in the past put other people at risk for injury or death because they had health problems they had not disclosed to the company. Such a claim asserted without specific evidence cannot be taken on faith; at the same time, the company’s defense for flouting health privacy laws absolutely convinces everyone that the company’s executives do not trust employees to be honest or value others’ safety.

As a personal injury attorney who regularly helps railroad workers who develop occupational illnesses and get injured on the job. I also strongly suspect that BNSF wanted access to employees’ complete medical records so it could use the information to claim that any work-related injury or disease was caused by a “preexisting condition.” I already know railroads will use just about any defense to avoid liability, so having all of a hurt or sick worker’s medical records would almost certainly be a temptation BNSF could not resist.

I am equally convinced that if BNSF’s Rule 26.3.1 had withstood union objections and EEOC review, Amtrak, CSX, Norfolk Southern and every other rail corporation would soon require their workers to share every piece of health information. That won’t happen for now, but the railroads must be watched closely for their next effort to violate employees’ health privacy rights.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


CSX Employees Injured When Train Crashes Near Gary, IN Switching Yard

The New Jersey-bound freight train hit a derailed car from a regional coal train. One of the CSX crew members suffered a broken leg.

By Randy Appleton, Injured Rail Workers’ Attorney

Easter Sunday 2012 dawned badly for two CSX Transportation employees who were hospitalized with nonlife-threatening injuries after their train collided with a derailed car from a Chicago South Shore and South Bend Railroad coal train in Gary, Indiana. The cause of the initial derailment remains under investigation, but reports indicate that the CSX train hauling shipping containers from Chicago to Bergen, New Jersey (NJ), was unable to stop in time to avoid hitting the hopper that had fallen into its path from a parallel track near a switching yard.

 


View a larger map of where a CSX train collided with a derailed car from a regional coal train, sending two crew members to the hospital.

Rescue personnel had to cut CSX crew member from the wreckage, and one of the injured workers suffered a broken leg. Both of the hurt workers were released from the hospital the same day, according to the Northwest Indiana Times.

The accident is at least the second major crash involving CSX freight trains in Indiana this year. On January 7, three of the railroad corporation’s trains collided just north of Valparaiso. Officials cited a breakdown in communications among dispatchers and train crews as the main cause of that accident. Track conditions are being eyed in connection with the most-recent wreck.

Whatever investigators determine to be the root causes of the crashes, I know, as a personal injury attorney based in Virginia (VA) who has helped many CSX employees, that those factors will almost definitely be problems that could have been prevented. Rail companies have high duties to maintain safe working conditions for all employees. That means railroad tracks must be kept in proper repair, traffic and weather hazards must be fully and clearly communicated, and appropriate safety equipment and procedures must be in place for workers to use and follow.

If any of those safeguards were not present in either of the Indiana accidents, CSX should be held accountable for both compensating the people hurt and making safety improvements so similar crashes do not recur.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


Passenger Train Derailment in Canada Kills 3 VIA Rail Crew Members

At least 43 people suffered injuries. The rail employees who lost their lives were two engineers and a trainee.

By Rick Shapiro, Railroad Worker Wrongful Death Attorney

Three people died, including two engineers, when the locomotive and all five other cars of a VIA Rail passenger train derailed and flipped in Burlington Ontario, on February 26, 2012. According VIA, which is the Canadian equivalent of Amtrak, the third fatality was a railroad trainee who was riding along to observe.

The Toronto Star, which also noted that a 19-car train derailed in almost the exact same location in 2008, described the latest wreck this way: “The train left the tracks near Plains Rd. and King Rd. When it stopped, six cars lay zigzagged off the tracks, at least three flipped onto their sides and two lodged up against a building. Two cars appeared as though they had been snapped clean apart.”

Reports on the numbers of passengers and surviving crew members are still coming in. The day after the derailment, it was known that at least 45 people had gone to hospitals and that at least 3 of the casualties had been injured so badly they had to be airlifted from the scene.

Officials told the newspaper that track work was under way where the VIA Rail train ran off the rails. They also said the accident occurred while the train was switching from the closed track to an open one.

 

As a railroad employee injury and wrongful death lawyer based in Virginia (VA), my deepest condolences go out to the families of the train crew members who died in this derailment. I also wish all the injured speedy recoveries.

While it’s much too early to name a specific cause — investigations of rail crashes involving loss of life can take years – I know that ensuring the safety and health of all passengers and workers must always be the highest priority of any railroad corporation. Whatever lessons are learned from this derailment, I hope they are implemented quickly to prevent a similar tragedy.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


Jury: Asbestos Manufacturers, Users Conspired to Hide Health Risks

A retired pipefitter who developed mesothelioma after being exposed to airborne asbestos on the job has received a $90 million award for compensatory and punitive damages.

By Randy Appleton, Mesothelioma Attorney in Virginia

In his latest blog post to our Virginia (VA) personal injury lawyers website, my colleague Rick Shapiro reports on a $90 million jury award to a retired pipefitter who developed mesothelioma after being exposed to airborne asbestos on the job. Jurors accepted evidence that makers of asbestos insulation and the man’s employers had reached an agreement to keep quiet about short- and long-term asbestos dangers. To read more, click over to “$90M Mesothelioma Verdict Based on Evidence of Conspiracy by Manufacturers and Employers.”

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


NTSB: Speed Kills When Trains Follow Too Closely

NTSB is asking industry organizations and rail worker unions to ensure safe track speeds and train following distances are posted, communicated and observed.

By Rick Shapiro, Carolina Railroad Accident Attorney

Pointing to five major rear-end collisions involving freight trains during 2011, the National Transportation Safety Board has published two related safety recommendations regarding the importance of lowering speeds and increasing distances between trains sharing tracks and moving in the same direction. According to an agency press release, safety requirements for a following train include “being prepared to stop within one-half the range of vision.” The NTSB also stressed that “complete understanding of and strict compliance with restricted speed requirements are absolutely mandatory to prevent catastrophic train collisions.”

The following wrecks, which left numerous railroad employees injured and killed, raised NTSB’s concerns:

This memorial video shows the aftermath of the CSX rear-end crash in Mineral Springs in which an engineer ad a conductor on one train lost their lives and the two crew members on the other train suffered injuries requiring hospital treatment:

Recognizing that employers have as great a responsibility as rail workers for ensuring that safe track speeds and train following distances are posted, communicated and adhered to, the NTSB is asking the Association of American Railroads and the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association to emphasize these safety messages. On the employee side, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and the United Transportation Union have also been contacted to spread the word about the importance of observing speed limits when sharing tracks.

As a Virginia-based railroad accident and FELA lawyer, I have seen firsthand the serious injuries that can result when trains collide or must stop suddenly and unexpectedly even at very low speeds. In light of the growing number of rear-end crashes attributable, at least in part, to excess speed and following too closely, I encourage railroads and rail employees to work together to make sure speed and distance rules are clarified and followed.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


Two CSX Workers Injured in 3-Train Collision, Derailment in Indiana

Rail companies such as Amtrak, CSX and NS must equip crews with communications equipment and training that ensures everyone aboard a train in danger of being in an accident with another train can keep informed of relative positions, hazards and unforeseen developments.

By Rick Shapiro, FELA Attorney for Injured Rail Employees

An inexplicable crash involving three CSX freight trains in Indiana on Friday, January 7, 2011, sent two railroad workers to the hospital with injuries and caused a fire fueled by ethanol, diesel fuel and other chemicals. No one living or driving in the area surrounding the wreck and derailment reported injuries, but homes were briefly evacuated over concerns that fumes from the burning toxic substances could harm people.

In all, six crew members — engineers and conductors — were aboard the trains that collided in Porter County, northeast of Valparaiso, IN. News reports stated that four of the rail workers had no injuries, but also described the accident in terms like, “A CSX train that had been pulling mostly empty tankers of ethanol stopped on the tracks and was rear-ended by a second train … . A third train on parallel tracks then came up and struck the derailed cars.”

As a FELA attorney based in Virginia (VA) who has represented railroad workers injured in on-the-job accidents involving Amtrak, CSX and Norfolk Southern trains, rails and rail yards, I find it a little difficult to believe that only two people got hurt in the wreck and fire. Mostly, though, I’m confused about how the accident could have occurred at all.

It is not unusual for trains to share tracks or pass on parallel rail. It is also not unusual for freight lines to use one- or two-man crews and schedule departure and arrival times close together. It’s not even uncommon for a train to come to an unscheduled and unexpected stop in front of approaching trains.

What should never happen is that a rear-end collision, rail car derailment and debris-caused crash all occur because of tight scheduling, parallel routes and sudden stops. Rail companies such as Amtrak, CSX and NS must equip crews with communications equipment and training that ensures everyone aboard a train in danger of being in an accident with another train can keep informed of relative positions, hazards and unforeseen developments. My law firm has even successfully argued that one of our railroad employee clients suffered injuries in a head-on train wreck  because a dispatcher failed to follow proper procedures and regulations regarding radio communications.

Investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board have begun looking into whether a communications breakdown caused by malfunctioning or missing equipment or improper training caused the crash in Indiana. If such findings are made, CSX could be found to be in violation of the Safety Appliance Act and related radio regulations. That would make the rail company liable for compensating the injured workers.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


NJ Plan to Reduce Track Crossing Deaths Calls for Railroaders’ Input

The three-pronged approach calls for educating students of all ages about grade crossing safety, stepping up enforcement of anti-trespassing laws and making it more difficult for people to get onto tracks and rail beds by repairing and erecting fences and crossing gates.

By Rick Shapiro, Railroad Crossing Accident Victims’ Attorney

Even as the New Jersey Safety at Railroad Crossings Leadership Oversight Committee was holding its first-ever meeting on November 9, 2011, a pedestrian in Hamilton, NJ, became the 20th person in the Garden State to lose his life this year by being struck by a passenger train at a grade crossing. During 2010, New Jersey Transit, Amtrak and a few freight trains struck and killed 28 people in the state. In nearly every case, the pedestrian had intentionally or accidentally walked in the path of the train, often by ignoring lowered crossing gates or trespassing on railroad trestles.

Wasting no time, committee members representing state and federal agencies such as the New Jersey State Police, NJ Department of Education, National Highway Transportation Safety Administration and Federal Railroad Administration issued a preliminary plan to reverse the trend toward growing numbers of pedestrians dying while crossing tracks. The three-pronged approach calls for educating students of all ages about grade crossing safety, stepping up enforcement of anti-trespassing laws and making it more difficult for people to get onto tracks and rail beds by repairing and erecting fences and crossing gates.

Most importantly, the committee is reaching out to rail workers such as engineers, trackmen and rail yard employees to identify patterns in trespassing activities, increase reporting of trespassing incidents and develop strategies for preventing trespassing. Involving rail employees in the effort to lower pedestrian fatalities is essential both because railroaders have invaluable knowledge on the subject and because being involved in a crossing accident in which a pedestrian dies often has a shattering effect on the train’s crew.

This report on a grade crossing accident in which a car’s driver was killed describes the terrible mental toll fatal crashes take on locomotive engineers and other train crew members:

As a railroad accident injury and wrongful death attorney practicing in Virginia (VA), I work at a law firm whose clients have included both railroad employees and members of the public who have been involved in grade crossing accidents. I know firsthand that only bad things happen when trains collide with vehicles or pedestrians, and I hope the effort to prevent such tragedies in New Jersey succeeds.

Trains cannot stop on a dime, or even on a 70-story bank headquarters building. Approaching a crossing, bridge or stretch of track with a pedestrian in the way leaves rank-and-file conductors and engineers no real option for avoiding the crash that will likely kill the person on foot.  Railroads and track owners need to make sure gates, lights and warning signs are adequate and working properly. At the same time, transportation crews and those involved in train operations have a vital role to play in making crossings safer for themselves, for drivers and for pedestrians by sharing their knowledge about crossing hazards and how to mitigate them.

EJL

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton is an injury law firm whose attorneys have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases. Attorneys will our firm have served as chairmen of the Railroad section of the American Association for Justice. One of our attorneys wrote a major attorney’s encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Our offices are in Virginia Beach and Hampton, Virginia (VA), and Elizabeth City, North Carolina (NC). Our lawyers also hold licenses to practice in South Carolina (SC), West Virginia (WV), Kentucky (KY), Florida (FL) and Washington, DC, and have handled hundreds of railroad injury and FELA cases throughout the eastern United States. Rick Shapiro and James Lewis were included in the 2011 issue of Best Lawyers in America. They, along with fellow attorney John M. Cooper, were also named 2011 Virginia Super Lawyers for Personal Injury Law, an honor which fewer than 5 percent of outstanding lawyers receive. We would like to send you one of our FREE reports about railroad injury and FELA cases, such as Dos and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). We provide free initial confidential injury case consultations, so call us toll free at (800) 752-0042 before giving any statement or talking to a railroad claims agent. Our injury attorneys also host an extensive injury law video library on Youtube. Further, our lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


Warning: Handholds, Ladders on Autorack Freight Cars Vandalized, Putting Rail Employees at Risk

All Class I freight railroads have been alerted to the problem, potentially making the corporations strictly liable under FELA and the Safety Appliance Act if the companies do not take steps to identify and repair faulty equipment.

By John Cooper, FELA Plaintiff’s Attorney in Virginia

The Association of American Railroads has issued a third warning about intentional acts of vandalism in which convenience handles, steps and ladders on Autorack freight rail cars have been sawed through, making the equipment dangerous to use. The group originally alerted railroaders about this safety risk in 2009, but newly vandalized cars have been discovered in 2011.

A vandalized handle on an Autorack rail car

AAR is urging anyone who learns of the vandalism to “”pass it on to all co-workers, loading and unloading personnel, shop personnel, trainmen, contractors and all other personnel that may be working with Autorack equipment.” The organization also advises all crew member to closely inspect any recently added cars or cars returning to service after long rest periods for damage to handles, handholds, steps and ladders.

As a FELA plaintiff’s lawyer based in Virginia (VA) who has represented rail workers injured by inadequate or defective safety equipment, I find it encouraging that the warnings about the intentionally damaged rail cars have come from AAR. The association is the leading trade group for Class I freight railroads — particularly BNSF, CSX, Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific —  and Amtrak. This means all major rail corporations are aware of the danger posed to their employees.

Both the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and the Safety Appliance Act make railroads strictly liable for injuries to and deaths of employees who suffer from accidents caused by defective equipment company supervisors and executives knew or should have known about. In the real world outside the courthouse, then, the federal laws hold railroads responsible for identifying and fixing problems with equipment or, failing that, responsible for compensating victims of the companies’ negligence in making trains, rail cars, tracks and rail yards safer.

EJL

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton is an injury law firm whose attorneys have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases. Attorneys will our firm have served as chairmen of the Railroad section of the American Association for Justice. One of our attorneys wrote a major attorney’s encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Our offices are in Virginia Beach and Hampton, Virginia (VA), and Elizabeth City, North Carolina (NC). Our lawyers also hold licenses to practice in South Carolina (SC), West Virginia (WV), Kentucky (KY), Florida (FL) and Washington, DC, and have handled hundreds of railroad injury and FELA cases throughout the eastern United States. Rick Shapiro and James Lewis were included in the 2011 issue of Best Lawyers in America. They, along with fellow attorney John M. Cooper, were also named 2011 Virginia Super Lawyers for Personal Injury Law, an honor which fewer than 5 percent of outstanding lawyers receive. We would like to send you one of our FREE reports about railroad injury and FELA cases, such as Dos and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). We provide free initial confidential injury case consultations, so call us toll free at (800) 752-0042 before giving any statement or talking to a railroad claims agent. Our injury attorneys also host an extensive injury law video library on Youtube. Further, our lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.


Lawsuit Against UP, BNSF Seeks Federal Regulation of Diesel Fume Particulates as Solid Waste

Three environmental groups point to increased cancer and lung disease risks for rail employees and people living and working as far as 8 miles from 17 rail yards in California.

By Rick Shapiro, Railroad Worker Illness and FELA Attorney

Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific, the two largest freight railroads providing service to ports in California (CA), have been sued by a coalition of environmental groups who claim that the diesel fumes emitted by the trucks, heavy equipment and locomotives at the companies’ rail yards pose an unacceptable cancer and lung disease risk to railroad employees and people living and working in communities around the yards.

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, which is the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit,

Millions of Californians are exposed to toxic levels of pollution from BNSF and UP’s operations. The California Air Resources Board has found that communities even 8 miles away from some of BNSF and UP’s rail yards suffer from increased cancer risk. … Almost every week, the scientific community releases new studies showing the toxicity of diesel exhaust, which is associated with premature death, cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory disease, and even obesity and diabetes. Some researchers have even found a correlation between diesel exhaust and premature birth and lower IQ in children.

The East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice and the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice are also suing the railroads on behalf of people’s who have reported health problems as a result of their exposure to diesel fumes.

In a blog post about the federal suit, the NRDC cites studies that indicate recent efforts by BNSF and UP to clean up operation at their California yards have still left some nearby residents at risks for cancers and other illnesses that are 50 times higher than state standards. A key goal of the legal action is to have particulates in diesel exhaust declared a solid waste that is subject to the same federal regulations as hazardous solid waste, just as unburned diesel fuel itself is. Should that happen, all railroads — including Amtrak, CSX and Norfolk Southern — would be affected.

The lawsuit is timely. I wrote earlier in 2011 that researchers have begun tracking diesel emissions from a Los Angeles-area BNSF rail yard while at the same time recording health problems for people living in the neighborhood bordering the yard. Shortly after I posted that blog, one of my Virginia-based FELA attorneys reported that formaldehyde in diesel exhaust had been definitively categorized as a carcinogen by federal health and workplace safety officials.

Rail employees have some of the heaviest daily exposures to diesel exhaust.While the negative health effects of long-term exposure to diesel fumes have long been recognized by doctors, regulators and lawyers, most railroad workers have remained completely unaware that numerous carcinogens are contained in diesel exhaust. Awareness of “diesel asthma” has also been growing, and I have helped a conductor who developed asthma and became unable to work after spending years breathing exhaust from diesel-powered locomotives receive a substantial FELA settlement from the rail company that had employed him.

It’s too soon to know how the environmental groups’ lawsuit against BNSF and Union Pacific will turn out, or even whether the plaintiffs will have their day in court. However, any effort that calls attention to the health risks from diesel fume exposure has the welcome potential to make railroad work for conductors, engineers, carmen trackmen and others safer, as well as living and working near rail yards less dangerous.

EJL

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton is an injury law firm whose attorneys have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases. Attorneys will our firm have served as chairmen of the Railroad section of the American Association for Justice. One of our attorneys wrote a major attorney’s encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Our offices are in Virginia Beach and Hampton, Virginia (VA), and Elizabeth City, North Carolina (NC). Our lawyers also hold licenses to practice in South Carolina (SC), West Virginia (WV), Kentucky (KY), Florida (FL) and Washington, DC, and have handled hundreds of railroad injury and FELA cases throughout the eastern United States. Rick Shapiro and James Lewis were included in the 2011 issue of Best Lawyers in America. They, along with fellow attorney John M. Cooper, were also named 2011 Virginia Super Lawyers for Personal Injury Law, an honor which fewer than 5 percent of outstanding lawyers receive. We would like to send you one of our FREE reports about railroad injury and FELA cases, such as Dos and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). We provide free initial confidential injury case consultations, so call us toll free at (800) 752-0042 before giving any statement or talking to a railroad claims agent. Our injury attorneys also host an extensive injury law video library on Youtube. Further, our lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.