By Randy Appleton, Railroad Injury Lawyer in Virginia 

In his latest post to our law firm’s Norfolk Injuryboard blog site, my colleague Rick Shapiro decries a rollback of federal rules requiring rail corporations to install essential train-slowing and -stopping technology. The railroads, despite booking record profits, convinced regulators that protecting rail employees would be too expensive. To read more, click over to “Easing of Positive Train Control Requirement Endangers Railroad Workers.”

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Rick Shapiro, Railroad Employee Wrongful Death Attorney

A yearlong investigation into a fatal rear-end collision on tracks near Red Oak, Iowa (IA), that left two Burlington Northern Santa Fe train crew members dead led the National Transportation Safety Board to conclude that proper scheduling and technology could have prevented the crash or significantly lessened its severity.

View a larger map of where a fatal BNSF train collision occurred near Red Oak,IA.

NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman announced the findings on April 24, 2012. Her agency’s main conclusion was that the collision between the BNSF train and a stopped track maintenance vehicle occurred because the engineer and conductor crewing the moving train had fallen asleep. The two men began their shift at 2:13 am, and the accident happened around 6:00 am. Both had been working on-call schedules and had gone several days without getting adequate sleep.

Hersman went on to note that the rail employees’ fatigue would most likely have not led directly to a fatal crash if their locomotive and rail cars were equipped with positive train control systems. PTC could have automatically slowed the train, reducing the force of the impact, or stopped it altogether.

The NTSB chair also said that that the BNSF accident highlighted the need for rail equipment manufacturers to improve the crashworthiness of modular crew cabs. She promised her agency would be working on those.

In a press release, Hersman said, “Human nature – and our need for sleep – must be respected; it must be addressed. …  Humans are fallible and make mistakes and operational accidents can be prevented with positive train control.”

As a railroad worker injury and wrongful death attorney based in Virginia (VA), I know that PTC has supposed to be coming for all major railroads for some time. I also know that rail corporations — including Amtrak, BNSF, CSX and Norfolk Southern — have been pushing regulators to move back deadlines for PTC implementation. The billion-dollar corporations say installing the safety systems will cost too much. To me, this means the railroads place less value on the health and lives of their employees than required, or even approaching fair in light of the record profits companies like BNSf, CSX and NS have been making for years.

Failing the quick adoption of PTC, I hope BNSF and all other rail operators will at least look at staffing levels and scheduling practices, then make the appropriate adjustments to limit worker fatigue.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Randy Appleton, Railroad Repetitive Stress Injury Attorney

A civil jury award of just less than $1.25 million to a retired CSX Transportation brakeman and engineer who developed debilitating osteoarthritis in both knees has been upheld by a Maryland (MD) appeals court. In ordering the railroad corporation to compensate the man for past and future medical expenses related to the degenerative disease, as well as pain and suffering, judges in Baltimore County noted that “”the Federal Employers’ Liability Act imposes on the defendant railroad a duty to [its] employees and to all of [its] employees including [this plaintiff] to exercise reasonable care to provide the employee with a reasonably safe place in which to work, reasonably safe conditions to work and reasonably safe tools and equipment.”

CSX argued during both the circuit and appeals court cases that provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act, or FRSA, spelling out requirements for placing and maintaining gravel on rail beds prohibited rail workers from filing FELA claims for compensation for injuries or health problems blamed on unsafe ballast. As a personal injury attorney in Virginia (VA) whose law firm has helped rail workers win cases involving poorly groomed and graded ballast, I know CSX’s defense was bogus. The jurors and appellate judges in Maryland saw through the railroad’s legal smoke and mirrors, too.

The plaintiff in the case ultimately decided as CSX Transportation v. Pitts began his rail career as a trackman in 1971 and spent the next 32 years as a fireman, conductor and engineer. Each job required him to walk as much as 2 miles each day on gravel beds. The uneven and shifting surface strained his knees to the point that he eventually began suffering muscle and cartilage tears, the grinding of bone on bone and constant pain. Arthritis is one of the most common results of repetitive stress injuries for railroad employees.

There is no question that repetitive stresses and occupational illnesses — whether respiratory, such as mesothelioma, or degenerative, such as spinal disc damage — are grounds for FELA lawsuits. Despite this, rail companies will often try to avoid liability for not protecting employees’ lives and health. I am pleased to see that CSX was held accountable this time.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Rick Shapiro, Injured Rail Employee Attorney

After an Amtrak train collided with a tractor-trailer sitting across tracks near Alpaugh, Calfiornia (CA), the engineer controlling the locomotive went to a hospital for treatment of a back injury. Two passengers also sustained minor injuries and were treated at the scene.

According to KNSF-TV ABC30, the truck’s driver did not see or hear the train approaching as he stopped his big rig at a stop sign near a grade crossing. The trucker also failed to notice a gate lowering across his flatbed trailer, which was still in the train’s path. The engineer tried to slow and sounded his horn to no avail.

While I primarily represent railroad employees who suffer on-the-job injuries in Virginia (VA), North Carolina (NC) and Florida (FL), this train-truck collision caught my attention because of the incident’s similarity to a case my firm handled in 2005. Our client was a CSX conductor trainee who sustained a severe spinal injury when a truck caused a crash on rail yard tracks. She had to abandon her rail career, and we were able to help her recover $650,000 in damages.

Whenever accidents involving large commercial trucks and locomotives occur, injuries or fatalities are practically inevitable. I wish the Amtrak engineer a full and speedy recovery. I also hope the California accident remind all drivers of the dangers they, rail workers and passengers face at crossings.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Rick Shapiro, Railroad Worker Wrongful Death Attorney

Three people died, including two engineers, when the locomotive and all five other cars of a VIA Rail passenger train derailed and flipped in Burlington Ontario, on February 26, 2012. According VIA, which is the Canadian equivalent of Amtrak, the third fatality was a railroad trainee who was riding along to observe.

The Toronto Star, which also noted that a 19-car train derailed in almost the exact same location in 2008, described the latest wreck this way: “The train left the tracks near Plains Rd. and King Rd. When it stopped, six cars lay zigzagged off the tracks, at least three flipped onto their sides and two lodged up against a building. Two cars appeared as though they had been snapped clean apart.”

Reports on the numbers of passengers and surviving crew members are still coming in. The day after the derailment, it was known that at least 45 people had gone to hospitals and that at least 3 of the casualties had been injured so badly they had to be airlifted from the scene.

Officials told the newspaper that track work was under way where the VIA Rail train ran off the rails. They also said the accident occurred while the train was switching from the closed track to an open one.

As a railroad employee injury and wrongful death lawyer based in Virginia (VA), my deepest condolences go out to the families of the train crew members who died in this derailment. I also wish all the injured speedy recoveries.

While it’s much too early to name a specific cause — investigations of rail crashes involving loss of life can take years – I know that ensuring the safety and health of all passengers and workers must always be the highest priority of any railroad corporation. Whatever lessons are learned from this derailment, I hope they are implemented quickly to prevent a similar tragedy.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Rick Shapiro, Attorney for Railroad Accident Victims

Failure to warn the train’s crew about a track washout, combined with a long-term refusal to fix storm water runoff problems, caused a fatal Canadian National railroad derailment in Cherry Valley, Illinois (IL). Those are the essential findings from a 20-month National Transportation Safety Board investigation into a June 2009 grade-crossing accident that caused an ethanol-fueled fire that claimed the life of one woman trapped in a nearby stopped car and badly burned several other drivers and passengers.

View a larger map of Cherry Valley, IL, where a 2009 CN train derailemnt and ethanol fire killed one and injured several.

Working with the Federal Railroad Administration and the cooperation of CN officials, the NTSB determined that the rail company knew the track had been washed away at least an hour before the deadly wreck and that at least two other storms had taken out the rails at the crossing in Winnebago County near Rockford. The agency recommended that Canadian Railroad and all other rail corporations update and strengthen policies and practices regarding “internal emergency communications, weather-alert policies and rules, tank-car vulnerabilities, inspection and maintenance of storm water detention ponds, the accuracy of train consist information, construction standards for underground pipelines at railroad crossings.”

CN has already settled combined wrongful death and injury claims from one family affected by the derailment for $36.2 million. A spokesman for the railroad also told the Chicago Tribune that his company had completely revised its weather reporting for train crews and addressed design issues at crossings in flood-prone areas. The spokesman also said, “If good things can come out of tragedy, we hope the recommendations are put into place as quickly as possible, and that they help make sure CN’s safety culture gets better.”

The real question, though, is why Canadian National didn’t take action after the previous washouts that didn’t result in tragedy. Or, since it did not, why did the company not act after a similar weather-related accident in Mississippi (MS) in April 2009 — two months before the Illinois derailment.

This blog post from fellow FELA attorney Joseph M. Miller, with whom I have collaborated in cases heard in New Orleans, provides the full details of the Mississippi crash that left an engineer severely injured. It’s worth reading, but I’ll provide the minor spoiler of revealing that CN failed to warn the engineer and other crew members that a storm had knocked a huge tree across the tracks.

NTSB’s recommendations seem particularly appropriate for the passenger and freight rail lines that operate in Norfolk and Newport News, Virginia (VA), where I practice railroad law. The tracks owned and used by Amtrak, CSX and Norfolk Southern are definitely at risk for flooding and damage from the thunderstorms, nor’easters and tropical storms that regularly buffet Hampton Roads. If CN can be taken at its word that the company has already begun implementing changes to protect crews and the public from weather-related accidents, I hope all other rail corporations do the same.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Rick Shapiro, Carolina Railroad Accident Attorney

Pointing to five major rear-end collisions involving freight trains during 2011, the National Transportation Safety Board has published two related safety recommendations regarding the importance of lowering speeds and increasing distances between trains sharing tracks and moving in the same direction. According to an agency press release, safety requirements for a following train include “being prepared to stop within one-half the range of vision.” The NTSB also stressed that “complete understanding of and strict compliance with restricted speed requirements are absolutely mandatory to prevent catastrophic train collisions.”

The following wrecks, which left numerous railroad employees injured and killed, raised NTSB’s concerns:

• Red Oak, Iowa (IA), April 17, 2011, BNSF
• Low Moor, Virginia (VA), May 21, 2011, CSX
• Mineral Springs, North Carolina (NC), May 24, 2011, CSX
• DeWitt, New York (NY), July 6, 2011, CSX
• DeKalb, Indiana (IN), August 19, 2011, Norfolk Southern

This memorial video shows the aftermath of the CSX rear-end crash in Mineral Springs in which an engineer ad a conductor on one train lost their lives and the two crew members on the other train suffered injuries requiring hospital treatment:

Recognizing that employers have as great a responsibility as rail workers for ensuring that safe track speeds and train following distances are posted, communicated and adhered to, the NTSB is asking the Association of American Railroads and the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association to emphasize these safety messages. On the employee side, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and the United Transportation Union have also been contacted to spread the word about the importance of observing speed limits when sharing tracks.

As a Virginia-based railroad accident and FELA lawyer, I have seen firsthand the serious injuries that can result when trains collide or must stop suddenly and unexpectedly even at very low speeds. In light of the growing number of rear-end crashes attributable, at least in part, to excess speed and following too closely, I encourage railroads and rail employees to work together to make sure speed and distance rules are clarified and followed.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Randy Appleton, Attorney Representing Railroad Employees in FELA Cases

A 57-year-old welder for Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company died after being struck by and pulled under a rail grinder in a rail yard in Amarillo, Texas (TX). A BNSF spokesman told reporters the fatal January 9, 2011, on-the-job accident appears to have resulted from “some kind of miscommunication” while the rail maintenance car was being moved from one track to another so it could be repaired.

I find that statement particularly interesting because my Virginia Beach, VA-based FELA lawyer colleague Rick Shapiro recently noted  that a 3-train collision in Indiana (IN) which left two of six crew members seriously injured also seemingly resulted from a breakdown in communications. The federal Safety Appliance Act requires railroad corporations to supply employees with the equipment and training needed to ensure all workers in danger of being injured or killed stay informed of where hazards exist and how those hazards can be avoided or mitigated.

Full and proper communication can only occur when the people who must share information have the tools to do so, the understanding of when and how to communicate essential facts, and the knowledge to interpret and act on the data they receive. BNSF may be initially pointing to “miscommunication” as a means of laying the groundwork for a defense against a Federal Employers’ Liability Act or SAA lawsuit, but it and other railroads have high duties to make sure their worker can and do communicate while performing dangerous tasks.

Investigators from the Federal Railroad Administration and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration have begun looking into the causes of the deadly accident in BNSF’s Amarillo yard. Regardless of the agencies’ findings, something obviously went as wrong as it could and a man lost his life in a way that could almost definitely be prevented. When the problems with equipment or work procedures are eventually identified, BNSF and all other similarly situated rail operators must make changes aimed at ensuring such fatal accidents do not recur.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Rick Shapiro, FELA Attorney for Injured Rail Employees

An inexplicable crash involving three CSX freight trains in Indiana on Friday, January 7, 2011, sent two railroad workers to the hospital with injuries and caused a fire fueled by ethanol, diesel fuel and other chemicals. No one living or driving in the area surrounding the wreck and derailment reported injuries, but homes were briefly evacuated over concerns that fumes from the burning toxic substances could harm people.

In all, six crew members — engineers and conductors — were aboard the trains that collided in Porter County, northeast of Valparaiso, IN. News reports stated that four of the rail workers had no injuries, but also described the accident in terms like, “A CSX train that had been pulling mostly empty tankers of ethanol stopped on the tracks and was rear-ended by a second train … . A third train on parallel tracks then came up and struck the derailed cars.”

As a FELA attorney based in Virginia (VA) who has represented railroad workers injured in on-the-job accidents involving Amtrak, CSX and Norfolk Southern trains, rails and rail yards, I find it a little difficult to believe that only two people got hurt in the wreck and fire. Mostly, though, I’m confused about how the accident could have occurred at all.

It is not unusual for trains to share tracks or pass on parallel rail. It is also not unusual for freight lines to use one- or two-man crews and schedule departure and arrival times close together. It’s not even uncommon for a train to come to an unscheduled and unexpected stop in front of approaching trains.

What should never happen is that a rear-end collision, rail car derailment and debris-caused crash all occur because of tight scheduling, parallel routes and sudden stops. Rail companies such as Amtrak, CSX and NS must equip crews with communications equipment and training that ensures everyone aboard a train in danger of being in an accident with another train can keep informed of relative positions, hazards and unforeseen developments. My law firm has even successfully argued that one of our railroad employee clients suffered injuries in a head-on train wreck  because a dispatcher failed to follow proper procedures and regulations regarding radio communications.

Investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board have begun looking into whether a communications breakdown caused by malfunctioning or missing equipment or improper training caused the crash in Indiana. If such findings are made, CSX could be found to be in violation of the Safety Appliance Act and related radio regulations. That would make the rail company liable for compensating the injured workers.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.

By Rick Shapiro, Injured Rail Employee Attorney

For the fourth time since 2009, Western states freight railroad giant Union Pacific has been sanctioned by federal authorities for illegally firing an injured rail employee after the worker reported an on-the-job injury. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued its latest whistleblower ruling against UP on December 20, 2011, writing in a press release that the rail corporation must immediately rehire the Idaho (ID)-based worker and pay the man $300,000 in compensation, back wages and punitive damages.

Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Dr. David Michaels said that for all railroads, “this case sends a clear message that OSHA will not tolerate retaliation against workers for reporting a work-related injury. … The safety of all workers is endangered when employers intimidate injured workers so that they do not report injuries.”

How soon the rail worker can return to his job and collect his whistleblower judgment remains unclear. Union Pacific pledged to appeal OSHA’s decision, claiming that separate investigations into how and why it fired the injured employee less than a month after he reported his injury found no wrongdoing by the company.

As a Virginia (VA) railroad accident and FELA attorney who has helped dozens of railroaders receive compensation for injuries they suffered while working, I have no problem with UP exercising its right to appeal. I also strongly suspect that the rail corporation will lose. Courts and regulators have long — and invaluable to rail employees — histories of upholding strict liability provision of laws such as the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and whistleblower protections under the Federal Railroad Safety Act.

To summarize how federal labor laws work to protect railroad employees for Amtrak, BNSF, CSX, Norfolk Southern and every other rail corporation as simply as possible: Rail companies must provide safe workplaces, properly working equipment and adequate training. When preventable accidents occur and on-the-job injuries result, railroads cannot deny injured workers’ their rights to report the incidents, receive fair compensation or keep their jobs after drawing attention to unsafe conditions.

EJL

About the Editors: The Virginia- and Carolina-based attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have long histories of representing railroad workers in FELA and other railroad injury cases and of helping victims of rail crossing accidents. Lawyers at our firm have served as chairmen of the railroad section of the American Association for Justice, the largest national victim’s injury attorney organization, and one of our attorneys wrote a major legal encyclopedia section on railroad safety litigation. Check out our railroad injury case results to see for yourself. Be sure to get your free reports about railroad injury, disease and wrongful death FELA cases: The Do’s and Don’ts When Injured at a Railroad — Yours FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Won’t Tell You (But You Must Know). Also, our railroad injury lawyers proudly moderate the Yardlimits Railroad Community Forum and donate to the Fallen Brother Fund.